Jump to content

Talk:Shivaji

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mahusha (talk) 07:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Former good article nomineeShivaji was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
June 17, 2018Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 6, 2012, June 6, 2014, June 6, 2015, June 6, 2018, June 6, 2021, June 6, 2023, and June 6, 2024.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Semi-protected edit request on 29 August 2024

[edit]

In the article there should have title which is 'Chhatrapati' with the name of Shivaji Maharaj. Also you should have written Maharaj after Shivaji as it shows respect towards the man who is people's true king not the King of any piece of land. So my humble request towards you to make this correction in your article as this not about any other king or emperor but about the man who faught for the justice for the people. Thank you. 2409:4081:1206:E43A:1E1:671:7337:ACDD (talk) 07:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: see FAQ Cannolis (talk) 08:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I request you to please do it. 2405:201:21:C128:951B:CAE9:C4F8:EE7F (talk) 17:09, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I support you Parth king739 (talk) 07:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2024

[edit]

In the "commemorations" section, in "The headquarters in Mumbai of the Western Railway zone, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, was renamed Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus in 1996.", the headquarters is of Central Railways, not Western Railways. [1]

Also, it has been furthur renamed to "Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus" in 2017. [2] [3] 117.98.114.75 (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Rainsage (talk) 06:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the name

[edit]

Change the name to "chhatrapati shavaji maharaj" it shows respect towards the king. 2409:4080:396:2B63:0:0:C43:B8A1 (talk) 19:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Please see WP:TITLESINTITLES. Rasnaboy (talk) 20:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Correct I on behalf of being a Maharashtrian Support this. Parth king739 (talk) 07:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2025

[edit]

"change Shivaji to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj " everywhere in the article Parth king739 (talk) 07:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: page move requests should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Ultraodan (talk) 12:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Change article name to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.

[edit]

Only Shivaji is is form of disrespect to the King or "Raje" it is important to change the name to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj everywhere in the articles atleast to Shivaji Maharaj Parth king739 (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shivaji didn't wrote the letter of remonstrance of Jizya

[edit]

There is a letter written in the Governance -> Religious Policy section of this article. The letter of remonstrance of Jizya. But many scholars have came to the conclusion that it was not written by Shivaji. I don't want to go into the details about how it is proved it was not written by Shivaji. I will give some names of eminent historians who have said it was not written by Shivaji. Please see the following:

  • Zahiruddin Faruqi, Aurangzeb and his Times, page 160

Link : https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.529984/page/n185/mode/2up?view=theater

  • Elphinstone, The History of India, Vol. II, Book XI, page 494.

Link : https://archive.org/details/the-history-of-india-02/page/494/mode/1up?view=theater

  • Irfan Habib

Link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTZI2365308, see from timestamp 34:00

  • Gajanan Mehendale, Shivaji His Life and Times, appendix 9.

So I request to give me permission to remove the letter from the section. Mahusha (talk) 07:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, perhaps we can create an article on this letter and include in it the differing opinions about historicity, authorship etc. if modern sources can be found attesting to the above. But for now you can remove it. - Ratnahastin (talk) 07:27, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok removing it now. Mahusha (talk) 08:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]